Have Lens, Will Travel: Why a 24-70mm is all you need for vacation I EDUCATION | Kayla Lee | Minnesota Wedding + Elopement Photography

Have Lens, Will Travel: Why a 24-70mm is all you need for vacation I EDUCATION

Jul 11, 2017

BLOG

PORTFOLIO

The Wedding experience

Meet Kayla

SAVE YOUR DATE

REVIEWS

RESOURCES

PERSONAL

VENDOR SPOTLIGHT

ELOPEMENT

WEDDINGS

More Categories

Browse Posts

EDUCATION

Browse Posts

ELOPEMENTS

Browse Posts

Weddings

SEARCH

find me elsewhere:

Hi there! Welcome to the KLP Blog, a journal about all the things that I love about life. Stay a while and say hello!

Hi, I'm kayla.

 

The last time I went on a legitimate vacation was 2014. We could refer to that time as BCE: Before Camera Extremism. I had three or four lenses at that time that I used on my cropped sensor Nikon D7100, so it wasn’t too hard to decide what ones I was going to bring with me. I always left the heavy work for my old reliable, but 70-300mm. It was a beast, but it did (and still does) beautiful work. It allowed me to capture each and every side of Israel I visited. 

 

Three years later, however, I am fully in the CE era, so the struggle is real in regards as to what lens to take on vacation. I can’t take them all, and nor would I want to (I have nightmares as it is about my 85mm falling and breaking moments before a wedding as it is, I don’t need any reason for that scenario to become a reality). But now that I am a little older and wiser, I know that my lens needs have changed that make my 70-300mm somewhat obsolete for my style (despite the fact that just this morning I received an email about this lens’s evolution): I know I have a hankering for wide angles, and I no longer live for major zoomability (which is not a real word, but should be).

 

I had read a blog post by Virginia-based photographer Katelyn James where she recommended the 24-70mm for travel, which seemed to be a solution to my problem. She shoots Canon, but there is a Nikon version as well (so far, so good). It had a decent f-number at 2.8 (it is this number that creates a soft, blurry background; the smaller the number, the wider the the aperture, and the softer the background detail. See how much I’ve learned?). And it is a solid Nikkor lens.

 

 But really? Would I be OK with that restricted limit? As optimistic as I was (as I said, I knew too much to use my previous primary travel lens).

 

Well, after two weeks on the east coast, you tell me…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

LET'S BE SOCIAL

@kaylaleephotomn